<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sister Sage&#039;s Musings &#187; Michael Ignatieff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/tag/michael-ignatieff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca</link>
	<description>Center-left blog from Canadians across the country and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jane Taber and Candy Hoeppner Are Now Into Fiction: Part 1&#8211; Diabolical Wedgie Games: The Politics</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/10/10/jane-taber-and-candy-hoeppner-are-now-into-fiction-part-1-diabolical-wedgie-games-the-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/10/10/jane-taber-and-candy-hoeppner-are-now-into-fiction-part-1-diabolical-wedgie-games-the-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough on crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill c-391]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candice Hoeppner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Taber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban-rural divide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=10149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Yes, Jane Taber is all ga ga giddy, again, for her precious Harpercons and this time it&#8217;s over her new girlfriend, Candy getchergun Hoeppner.  Boys &#8216;n&#8217; girls, Janie is all ga ga giddy this time because she is of the belief that Candy getcherguns Hoeppner, and she alone, is responsible for collapsing the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/10/10/jane-taber-and-candy-hoeppner-are-now-into-fiction-part-1-diabolical-wedgie-games-the-politics/">Jane Taber and Candy Hoeppner Are Now Into Fiction: Part 1&#8211; Diabolical Wedgie Games: The Politics</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/10/10/jane-taber-and-candy-hoeppner-are-now-into-fiction-part-1-diabolical-wedgie-games-the-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harpercon Booster Jane Taber and the Rest of the Reformatories All Hurt By Iggy</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/04/harpercon-booster-jane-taber-and-the-rest-of-the-reformatories-all-hurt-by-iggy/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/04/harpercon-booster-jane-taber-and-the-rest-of-the-reformatories-all-hurt-by-iggy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 19:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflated egos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Taber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=7848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Ok, Jane, you got what you wanted,  your dreamy Steve got his precious kingdom and Iggy is gone. What the hell is your problem now? Are you perhaps auditioning for  Sun News (oops! Bell dropped &#8216;em)?   Yes, poor Jane and the other Harpercons are a tad upset today because Iggy didn&#8217;t offer an <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/04/harpercon-booster-jane-taber-and-the-rest-of-the-reformatories-all-hurt-by-iggy/">Harpercon Booster Jane Taber and the Rest of the Reformatories All Hurt By Iggy</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/04/harpercon-booster-jane-taber-and-the-rest-of-the-reformatories-all-hurt-by-iggy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of The Road: No Time To Be Lulled Into a False Sense of Security and Stevie Can Still Get His Majority</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/01/end-of-the-road-no-time-to-be-lulled-into-a-false-sense-of-security-and-stevie-can-still-get-his-majority/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/01/end-of-the-road-no-time-to-be-lulled-into-a-false-sense-of-security-and-stevie-can-still-get-his-majority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 02:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism v sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Taber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bloc Quebecois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=7796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>We have no arrived at the end of the road of  election 41 campaign. We have been polled, tweeted,  newsed, etc.   Before I go on, I would like to review all the party&#8217;s campaigns briefly.</p> <p>Maybe there is something to be said for peek-a-boo campaigns? Jane Taber was certainly very complimentary of <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/01/end-of-the-road-no-time-to-be-lulled-into-a-false-sense-of-security-and-stevie-can-still-get-his-majority/">End of The Road: No Time To Be Lulled Into a False Sense of Security and Stevie Can Still Get His Majority</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/05/01/end-of-the-road-no-time-to-be-lulled-into-a-false-sense-of-security-and-stevie-can-still-get-his-majority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Winner of The French Debate&#8211;Mme Muguette Paille of La Mauricie-Perhaps Canada&#8217;s &#8220;Joe The Plumber&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/14/the-winner-of-the-french-debate-mme-muguette-paille-of-la-mauricie-perhaps-canadas-joe-the-plumber/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/14/the-winner-of-the-french-debate-mme-muguette-paille-of-la-mauricie-perhaps-canadas-joe-the-plumber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ageism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French leaders debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mme Paille]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strawberry Poutine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=7547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>While the punditry, pollsters, bloggers, media types and spin doctors all sort out as to who won and who lost last night&#8217;s French language debate, many from Twitter and Facebook have declared another winner.  Not a political leader; not even in politics.  The unsung heroine of last night appears to be none other <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/14/the-winner-of-the-french-debate-mme-muguette-paille-of-la-mauricie-perhaps-canadas-joe-the-plumber/">The Winner of The French Debate&#8211;Mme Muguette Paille of La Mauricie-Perhaps Canada&#8217;s &#8220;Joe The Plumber&#8221;?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/14/the-winner-of-the-french-debate-mme-muguette-paille-of-la-mauricie-perhaps-canadas-joe-the-plumber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Needs To Happen In The French Debate This Fine Evening</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/13/what-needs-to-happen-in-the-french-debate-this-fine-evening/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/13/what-needs-to-happen-in-the-french-debate-this-fine-evening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Debate 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=7523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Tonight&#8217;s French language debate will no doubt have much fewer viewers outside of Quebec, but there are many Francophones in the rest of Canada who will probably tune in as well. Not to mention, the punditry will all be out observing with the help of translators no doubt and there will be the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/13/what-needs-to-happen-in-the-french-debate-this-fine-evening/">What Needs To Happen In The French Debate This Fine Evening</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/13/what-needs-to-happen-in-the-french-debate-this-fine-evening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stevie Looked Like He Was On Drugs, Duceppe Won For Facial Expressions, Iggy Didn&#8217;t Land That Crucial Punch, Layton Won</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/12/stevie-looked-like-he-was-on-drugs-duceppe-won-for-facial-expressions-iggy-didnt-land-that-crucial-punch-layton-won/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/12/stevie-looked-like-he-was-on-drugs-duceppe-won-for-facial-expressions-iggy-didnt-land-that-crucial-punch-layton-won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough on crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Debate 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=7499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>For openers, I&#8217;d really like to know who Stevie Spiteful&#8217;s pusher is. I mean, all three of them were attacking him and yet, he always looked calm. Too calm, in fact, he looked stoned.  Had to have been a pharmaceutical explanation for this.</p> <p>Stevie did give himself away though.  He has no plans <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/12/stevie-looked-like-he-was-on-drugs-duceppe-won-for-facial-expressions-iggy-didnt-land-that-crucial-punch-layton-won/">Stevie Looked Like He Was On Drugs, Duceppe Won For Facial Expressions, Iggy Didn&#8217;t Land That Crucial Punch, Layton Won</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/12/stevie-looked-like-he-was-on-drugs-duceppe-won-for-facial-expressions-iggy-didnt-land-that-crucial-punch-layton-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juxtapose With Harpercon Cheerleaders&#8211;More Awesome Blogging SupposiTory Hypocrisy!</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/08/juxtapose-with-harpercon-cheerleaders-more-awesome-blogging-suppository-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/08/juxtapose-with-harpercon-cheerleaders-more-awesome-blogging-suppository-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough on crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers too dumb to blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Adler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrmGrl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual assault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=7390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Man, the hypocrisy of these Harpercon crybabies just keep crawling out of the woodwork. Today, we have the Chuckles Adler edition, courtesy of FrmGrl.I&#8217;ll verbally bitch slap her later because she richly deserves it today.</p> <p>Before I go on,  I believe that Liberal candidate, John Reilly,  running in the riding of Wildrose, should&#8217;ve been <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/08/juxtapose-with-harpercon-cheerleaders-more-awesome-blogging-suppository-hypocrisy/">Juxtapose With Harpercon Cheerleaders&#8211;More Awesome Blogging SupposiTory Hypocrisy!</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/08/juxtapose-with-harpercon-cheerleaders-more-awesome-blogging-suppository-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could The Red Book 2011 Backfire For the Liberals?</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/03/could-the-red-book-2011-backfire-for-the-liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/03/could-the-red-book-2011-backfire-for-the-liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Nicholls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red book 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=7287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>I&#8217;m going to play Devil&#8217;s advocate yet again, but more to the point I&#8217;m going to play the cynic here.  After all, given the pattern of the daily Nanos poll, showing the Harpercons going up steadily and the Liberals going down despite good campaigning from the Liberals and a poor one from the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/03/could-the-red-book-2011-backfire-for-the-liberals/">Could The Red Book 2011 Backfire For the Liberals?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/04/03/could-the-red-book-2011-backfire-for-the-liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Juxtapose With Lawrence Cannon</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/02/13/we-juxtapose-with-lawrence-cannon/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/02/13/we-juxtapose-with-lawrence-cannon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Fortress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political attack ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=6561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>In a letter to the editor to the Grope and Fail by none other than Harpercon puppet, Lawrence &#8220;Loose&#8221; Cannon, he basically rips into Iggy for his concerns regarding that North-American fortress.</p> <p>The Liberal Leader should put Canada ahead of politics and end the counter-productive, anti-Americanism that he himself once criticized.</p> <p>Now, did <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/02/13/we-juxtapose-with-lawrence-cannon/">We Juxtapose With Lawrence Cannon</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/02/13/we-juxtapose-with-lawrence-cannon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looks Like Harpercons Can&#8217;t Wait For The Budget To Call Spring Election</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/01/29/looks-like-harpercons-cant-wait-for-the-budget-to-call-spring-election/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/01/29/looks-like-harpercons-cant-wait-for-the-budget-to-call-spring-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Derangement Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=6397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>According to Susan Delacourt&#8217;s latest article,  one Don Burroughs received a call from the Harpercons yesterday afternoon.  It even appears that a date has been set for March 29th for election day.  Here&#8217;s more:</p> <p>Don Burroughs said he received a call from the Conservative party on Friday afternoon and was asked whether he <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/01/29/looks-like-harpercons-cant-wait-for-the-budget-to-call-spring-election/">Looks Like Harpercons Can&#8217;t Wait For The Budget To Call Spring Election</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2011/01/29/looks-like-harpercons-cant-wait-for-the-budget-to-call-spring-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year In Review: The Year The Public Disengaged</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/12/20/year-in-review-the-year-the-public-disengaged/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/12/20/year-in-review-the-year-the-public-disengaged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insane Right Wing Wackos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=5937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>This has been one sad year in Canadian politics. Allan Greg said it best when choosing the political moment of the year on the At Issue Panel this past Thursday: &#8220;&#8230;put&#8217;s us in worlds tallest pygmy territory.&#8221; No truer a statement has been said by a political pundit. That being said, I have <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/12/20/year-in-review-the-year-the-public-disengaged/">Year In Review: The Year The Public Disengaged</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/12/20/year-in-review-the-year-the-public-disengaged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loyal Opposition?  My letter to Ignatieff&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/11/16/loyal-opposition-my-letter-to-ignatieff/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/11/16/loyal-opposition-my-letter-to-ignatieff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=5265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Michael Ignatieff,</p> <p>You hold the position of the Leader of the Loyal Opposition in our House. You may be aware of this, if so, this is not coming across to the electorate. As the Leader of the Loyal Opposition, you have the honour and the priviledge and the duty to stand up in <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/11/16/loyal-opposition-my-letter-to-ignatieff/">Loyal Opposition?  My letter to Ignatieff&#8230;</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/11/16/loyal-opposition-my-letter-to-ignatieff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Awesome Power of Michael Ignatieff</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/13/the-awesome-power-of-michael-ignatieff/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/13/the-awesome-power-of-michael-ignatieff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TorontoEmerg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wingnuttery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=4168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Shorter Lawrence Cannon (and at last estimate, about 10, 000 Tory blogs): Michael Ignatieff, evil genius, is the real Foreign Affairs Minister.</p> <p>On the other embarrassing foreign policy debacle, we have this stupidity:</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;ve got an idea&#8230; let&#8217;s ask a former Liberal Defense Minister what he&#8217;d do in this situation.</p> <p>“The Harper <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/13/the-awesome-power-of-michael-ignatieff/">The Awesome Power of Michael Ignatieff</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/13/the-awesome-power-of-michael-ignatieff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Travers ponders a Conservative majority</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/09/travers-ponders-a-conservative-majority/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/09/travers-ponders-a-conservative-majority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 14:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jymn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Travers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mattbastard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=4054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>The Star&#8217;s James Travers scared Mattbastard back to bed this morning with a column on the frightening possibility of a Conservative majority. Travers goes through the likely scenarios and maps out the new reality of Canadian politics. That reality has been wedged single-handedly by Harper. He has split the nation, manifested the most unsavory of the nation&#8217;s <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/09/travers-ponders-a-conservative-majority/">Travers ponders a Conservative majority</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/10/09/travers-ponders-a-conservative-majority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Taylor, Put Up or Shut Up!</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/stephen-taylor-put-up-or-shut-up/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/stephen-taylor-put-up-or-shut-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill c-391]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=3763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>A typical Harpercon cheerleader&#8217;s modus operendi; psyche everyone out when things don&#8217;t look to be going their way. I had read on some of the blogs about Stephen Taylor tweeting that some Liberal MPs will be staying away from the vote tomorrow evening. I went to Twitter to check the feed out, to <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/stephen-taylor-put-up-or-shut-up/">Stephen Taylor, Put Up or Shut Up!</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/stephen-taylor-put-up-or-shut-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Got Lucky, Or Did He? Iggy On The Hot Seat. Bloc With Nothing To Lose. Stevie and Candy, Only Themselves To Blame&#8211;Some Last Thoughts Before Gun Registry Vote Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/jack-got-lucky-or-did-he-iggy-on-the-hot-seat-bloc-with-nothing-to-lose-stevie-and-candy-only-themselves-to-blame-some-last-thoughts-before-gun-registry-vote-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/jack-got-lucky-or-did-he-iggy-on-the-hot-seat-bloc-with-nothing-to-lose-stevie-and-candy-only-themselves-to-blame-some-last-thoughts-before-gun-registry-vote-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough on crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill c-391]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bloc Quebecois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban-rural divide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=3724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Dear readers, let&#8217;s forget for a moment where we stand on the long gun registry and gun control for a moment&#8211;it&#8217;s not what this post is about.  It&#8217;s solely about leadership and politics that have led to this point. Really, for the sake of this post, we could insert a vote on any <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/jack-got-lucky-or-did-he-iggy-on-the-hot-seat-bloc-with-nothing-to-lose-stevie-and-candy-only-themselves-to-blame-some-last-thoughts-before-gun-registry-vote-tomorrow/">Jack Got Lucky, Or Did He? Iggy On The Hot Seat. Bloc With Nothing To Lose. Stevie and Candy, Only Themselves To Blame&#8211;Some Last Thoughts Before Gun Registry Vote Tomorrow</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/09/21/jack-got-lucky-or-did-he-iggy-on-the-hot-seat-bloc-with-nothing-to-lose-stevie-and-candy-only-themselves-to-blame-some-last-thoughts-before-gun-registry-vote-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Looks Like Iggy Is Taking Kelly McParland&#8217;s Advice</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/28/it-looks-like-iggy-is-taking-kelly-mcparlands-advice/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/28/it-looks-like-iggy-is-taking-kelly-mcparlands-advice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough on crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris-Decima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal bus tour 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellow Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=3277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Susan Delacourt is one of the few columnists who has been not only printing the facts about Iggy&#8217;s bus tour, but has actually remained positive about it. I only wish some of the more Liberal leaning columnist would have (and would) followed her lead rather than to continue nitpicking and lamenting him. After <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/28/it-looks-like-iggy-is-taking-kelly-mcparlands-advice/">It Looks Like Iggy Is Taking Kelly McParland&#8217;s Advice</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/28/it-looks-like-iggy-is-taking-kelly-mcparlands-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well, Jack, Who Are We Supposed To Blame Then? Isn&#8217;t This The Sort of Thing You Chastise The Liberals For?</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/20/well-jack-who-are-we-supposed-to-blame-then-isnt-this-the-sort-of-thing-you-chastise-the-liberals-for/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/20/well-jack-who-are-we-supposed-to-blame-then-isnt-this-the-sort-of-thing-you-chastise-the-liberals-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 03:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill c-391]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=3182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Well, it&#8217;s official now. Jack Layton will not be whipping his caucus into voting against Mullet head Hoeppner&#8217;s Bill c-391, the scrapping of the long gun registry which will no doubt, set the precedent for Stevie Spiteful to go the way of no gun control, just like Texas and Arizona. Way to go <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/20/well-jack-who-are-we-supposed-to-blame-then-isnt-this-the-sort-of-thing-you-chastise-the-liberals-for/">Well, Jack, Who Are We Supposed To Blame Then? Isn&#8217;t This The Sort of Thing You Chastise The Liberals For?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/20/well-jack-who-are-we-supposed-to-blame-then-isnt-this-the-sort-of-thing-you-chastise-the-liberals-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jean Charest Takes Back a Former Government House Leader and Iggy&#8217;s Aid, Making Him An Offer He Couldn&#8217;t Refuse &amp; Jane Taber &amp; the Harpercons are Already Pointing Their Daggers at Iggy</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/11/jean-charest-takes-back-a-former-government-house-leader-and-iggys-aid-making-him-an-offer-he-couldnt-refuse-jane-taber-the-harpercons-are-already-pointing-their-daggers-at-iggy/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/11/jean-charest-takes-back-a-former-government-house-leader-and-iggys-aid-making-him-an-offer-he-couldnt-refuse-jane-taber-the-harpercons-are-already-pointing-their-daggers-at-iggy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Taber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean-Marc Fournier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=3027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Yes, we all knew this day was coming; Jean Charest would shuffle the cabinet. With his Quebec Liberals polling at all time lows given the last budget was chock full of user fees and the party is still mired in scandals, Charest is doing what many are calling  &#8220;shuffling the lawn chairs on <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/11/jean-charest-takes-back-a-former-government-house-leader-and-iggys-aid-making-him-an-offer-he-couldnt-refuse-jane-taber-the-harpercons-are-already-pointing-their-daggers-at-iggy/">Jean Charest Takes Back a Former Government House Leader and Iggy&#8217;s Aid, Making Him An Offer He Couldn&#8217;t Refuse &#038; Jane Taber &#038; the Harpercons are Already Pointing Their Daggers at Iggy</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/11/jean-charest-takes-back-a-former-government-house-leader-and-iggys-aid-making-him-an-offer-he-couldnt-refuse-jane-taber-the-harpercons-are-already-pointing-their-daggers-at-iggy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will There or Will There Not Be an Election This Fall? Who Would Want It, If Anyone At All?</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/10/will-there-or-will-there-not-be-an-election-this-fall-who-would-want-it-if-anyone-at-all/</link>
		<comments>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/10/will-there-or-will-there-not-be-an-election-this-fall-who-would-want-it-if-anyone-at-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Political Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malevolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadians Rally To Unseat Stephen Harper Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catch 22 campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harpercons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The N.D.P.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=3017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>Both EKOS and the usually Harpercon friendly Ipsos-Reid polls have Harpercon numbers slipping and those of the Liberals rising somewhat bringing them to a near tie with, of course, the Harpercons  hanging on to a slight advantage.  If Steve was really planning to get an election off the ground this fall, his plans <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/10/will-there-or-will-there-not-be-an-election-this-fall-who-would-want-it-if-anyone-at-all/">Will There or Will There Not Be an Election This Fall? Who Would Want It, If Anyone At All?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/08/10/will-there-or-will-there-not-be-an-election-this-fall-who-would-want-it-if-anyone-at-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

