<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How a Harpercon Canadian Flag Would Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/</link>
	<description>Center-left blog from Canadians across the country and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=2985#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>Wow! Aren&#039;t we testy? 

I expressed doubts in the post about it&#039;s authenticity. However, that tweet gave me the idea to create how a Harpercon flag would look in Steve&#039;s view, potentially; having a little fun at the same time. Got any objections to that?

What the hell is your problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Aren&#8217;t we testy? </p>
<p>I expressed doubts in the post about it&#8217;s authenticity. However, that tweet gave me the idea to create how a Harpercon flag would look in Steve&#8217;s view, potentially; having a little fun at the same time. Got any objections to that?</p>
<p>What the hell is your problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=2985#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>Dumbass, that &quot;news story&quot;, and the entire CBC radio progamme is a giant spoof joke program.

There&#039;s no MP by that name, nor does Toronto plan to change its traffic patterns to the other side of the road in anticipation of the queen&#039;s visit. 

Stop gobbling up everything you read and hear. Develop the ability to think critically and filter your own thoughts.

For your information, the radio show is called &quot;this is that&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumbass, that &#8220;news story&#8221;, and the entire CBC radio progamme is a giant spoof joke program.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no MP by that name, nor does Toronto plan to change its traffic patterns to the other side of the road in anticipation of the queen&#8217;s visit. </p>
<p>Stop gobbling up everything you read and hear. Develop the ability to think critically and filter your own thoughts.</p>
<p>For your information, the radio show is called &#8220;this is that&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3363</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=2985#comment-3363</guid>
		<description>Din&#039;t think of that H thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Din&#8217;t think of that H thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skinny Dipper</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator>Skinny Dipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=2985#comment-3362</guid>
		<description>Just to let the MP know that our flag is not part of a potuarlity contest.  It shows Canada&#039;s national weed--we should be proud of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let the MP know that our flag is not part of a potuarlity contest.  It shows Canada&#8217;s national weed&#8211;we should be proud of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skinny Dipper</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>Skinny Dipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=2985#comment-3361</guid>
		<description>I know that the T&#039;s are crosses.  Couldn&#039;t you have made the first one into an H?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that the T&#8217;s are crosses.  Couldn&#8217;t you have made the first one into an H?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3360</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=2985#comment-3360</guid>
		<description>Thanks Torontonian, sorry to have taken so long to approve your comment. I&#039;m still working out site issues. Since I&#039;ve upgrade, I&#039;ve been pulling my hair out to say the least.

I use either firefox or Google chrome here, which ever one my computer chooses to cooperate with on that given moment. 

I&#039;m going to visit my family for a week, and I think they use explorer. I&#039;m hoping to have these issues resolved before then, because, I don&#039;t know how much computer time I will be able to have. I imagine as it is, it will be light blogging.

Yeah, I know all about Harpercon talking points. But I don&#039;t shape my art to suit their talking points...wait a minute! I just did! Dollar signs; crosses; the &quot;C&quot;, his highness, himself!

Happy Sunday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Torontonian, sorry to have taken so long to approve your comment. I&#8217;m still working out site issues. Since I&#8217;ve upgrade, I&#8217;ve been pulling my hair out to say the least.</p>
<p>I use either firefox or Google chrome here, which ever one my computer chooses to cooperate with on that given moment. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to visit my family for a week, and I think they use explorer. I&#8217;m hoping to have these issues resolved before then, because, I don&#8217;t know how much computer time I will be able to have. I imagine as it is, it will be light blogging.</p>
<p>Yeah, I know all about Harpercon talking points. But I don&#8217;t shape my art to suit their talking points&#8230;wait a minute! I just did! Dollar signs; crosses; the &#8220;C&#8221;, his highness, himself!</p>
<p>Happy Sunday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torontonian</title>
		<link>http://sistersagesmusings.ca/2010/07/31/how-a-harpercon-canadian-flag-would-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3356</link>
		<dc:creator>Torontonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistersagesmusings.ca/?p=2985#comment-3356</guid>
		<description>Your phrase &quot; drawn the rectangle to shape the flag&quot;. . . .
-----
Conservatives shape the talking points to fit the debate
and agenda.  But you knew that, didn&#039;t you?

O/T  Comment feature needed a bit of a prod; a second or third
click on the comment feature did the trick.  Just thought you&#039;d 
like to know how it is.  I&#039;m using Explorer 8 and Windows 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your phrase &#8221; drawn the rectangle to shape the flag&#8221;. . . .<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Conservatives shape the talking points to fit the debate<br />
and agenda.  But you knew that, didn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>O/T  Comment feature needed a bit of a prod; a second or third<br />
click on the comment feature did the trick.  Just thought you&#8217;d<br />
like to know how it is.  I&#8217;m using Explorer 8 and Windows 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

